Culmination of Law

Culmination of Law

Pathology of administrative proceedings in the claims assessment boards of the Social Security Organization and providing a favorable model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad javad Rezaeezadeh 1
Mohammad Raeisi 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD Student in Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/thdad.2021.511118.1568
Abstract
Today, due to the powers of the executive bodies, litigation between the people and administrative authorities is common, due to the internal nature of these institutions, there is always the possibility of abuse of authority and disregard for the rights of clients. The multiplicity and diversity of these authorities in the Iranian administrative system has made it impossible for all of them to compile a single version for optimal trial and pathology. One of these authorities is the Board of First the Appraisal, which recognizes the claims subject to Articles 42 and 43 of the Social Security Law, which are the authority of the employer to object to the insurance premiums awarded by the Social Security Organization. It is the workers 'insurance premium, but the employers' rights are worth considering as a two-way relationship. A study of the executive regulations and instructions shows that in some cases, administrative proceedings in authorities are in accordance with the principles. Fair trial is not consistent, so by providing a favorable model, the shortcomings of the trial in these authorities can be reduced. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical and in the collection of resources, the library method has been used.
Keywords
Administrative proceedings
pathology
diagnostic board
social security organization
premium
Culmination of Law
Volume 7, Issue 1
Spring 2021
Pages 140-165