Agrarian Reforms Council is the most important exclusive administrative authority for agricultural lands in Iran's legal system. The limits of the competences, duties and powers of this council are specified in the Land Reforms Law and subsidiary laws and regulations. With the approval and implementation of the Land Reforms Law, like any other legal establishment, disputes may arise between the people, which the law has provided for this quasi-judicial authority with a special legal mechanism to make general decisions. Case decisions taken by this quasi-judicial authority can be appealed and contested in the branches of the Administrative Court of Justice. The general decisions and approvals of this authority can also be judicially supervised by the general board of the Administrative Court of Justice. This research, with analytical-descriptive method, seeks to analyze, criticize and find an answer to the question that what are the most important aspects of dealing with the decisions of the Land Reforms Council, including the annulment, violation and approval of the said decisions in the general board of the Administrative Court of Justice? The most important achievement of this research is to identify the competence of the general board of the Administrative Court of Justice regarding general approvals, verifying the conflict of votes in order to issue a unanimous vote and verifying the competence and powers of the Land Reforms Council.