Culmination of Law

Culmination of Law

Analysis of judicial supervision of the court On the arbitration competence

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Homayoun Mafi 1
Javad Shamsi 2
mahmood akbari 3
1 Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran
2 Phd student in private law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative services, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor , at Ayatollah Borujerdi University Boroujerd, Iran
10.22034/thdad.2023.542525.2016
Abstract
Judicial supervision is considered as integral part of the arbitration process, which is theoretically a rule derived from the principle of competence- competence. This rule means that the supervising court, regardless of the decision of the previous court at the time of the arbitration hearing, Supervises public jurisdiction by considering the contract and the arbitral award. Given that the relationship between arbitration and the court in all legal systems has raised many issues that the law is not explicit about, it seems necessary to examine the scope and effects of court supervision of this relationship in terms of competence. Therefore, the present article, which examines the analysis of court supervision of arbitration competence, seeks to answer the question of what is the position of court oversight in terms of formation, scope and effects? The findings of this study indicate that, in order to exercise court supervision, the existence of some conditions and the absence of obstacles are necessary. In the supervisory phase, in addition to controlling the general competence, the court is also responsible for appointing the competent arbitral tribunal, and despite the legislator's silence, the court supervision also includes the annulment of the arbitrator's incompetence. In the case of supervision, according to the principle of competence- competence, the court can also enforce the annulled judgement in another country and consider the annulment judgement to have a territorial effect. The effects of the court's supervision on the annulment case are mainly reflected in the presumption of annulment of competence judgement.
Keywords
Keywords: Arbitration
competence
Court Supervision
Arbitration Contract
voidance of judgement

Subjects

Boucaron ,Magali .)2013(. Le principe compétence-compétence
en droit de l’arbitrage ,Droit .Université Nice Sophia Antipolis .Français.
Feldman ,Mark B .)2020(. The Annulment Proceedings and the
Finality of ICSID Arbitral Awards ,ICSID Review -foreign investment
law journal.
Gaillard ,Emmanuel « .)1999(. L’effet négatif de la compétencecompétence
,» in Etudes de procédure et d‘arbitrage ,Mélanges Jean-François
Poudret ,Faculté de droit de l’Université de Lausanne ,Lausanne.
Ghibradze ,Nata .)2015(. Preclusion of Remedies Under Article
)3(16of the UNCITRAL Model Law 27 ,Pace Int’l L .Rev.345 .
Glovannini ,Teresa .)2005(. Qui Controle Les Pouvoirs Des Arbitres :Les Parties ,L’arbitre Ou La Cour D’arbitrage ,?les arbitres
internationaux ,Centre français de droit comparé ,Volume.8
Janićijević ,Dejan .)2015(. Multiparty Arbitration :Problems
And Latest Developments ,Law and Politics ,Vol ,13 .No , 1 pp.43 – 33 .
Kaufmann-Kohler G ,.Potestà M .)2020(. The Interplay Between
Investor-State Arbitration and Domestic Courts in the Existing IIA
Framework .In :Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts .European
Yearbook of International Economic Law .Springer ,Cham.
khin ,Ei.)2007(. Judicial Supervision on Commercial Arbitration
under the UNCITRAL Model Law and Arbitration Laws of
the United Kingdom ,the United States and Singapore ,Modern Social Culture
Research ,No2.
Mayer ,P « .)2008(. .L’autonomie de l’arbitrage international
dans l’appréciation de sa propre compétence ,» RCADI ,,volume.217 .
Pinna ,A « .)2008(. L’annulation d’une sentence arbitrale partielle
,» Rev .arb.615 ,
Richard A .Cole .)1986(. The public policy exception to the New
York convention on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral
award.
Karamanian ,Susan L .)2017(.courts and arbitration :Reconciling
the public with the privte 9 ,Arb .L .Rev.65 .
Culmination of Law
Volume 9, Issue 4
Winter 2024
Pages 213-247