A Comparative Study of the Nature and Effects of Relative Causes of Elimination or Obstruction of Criminal Liability in Iranian and Egyptian Law

Mortazi, Ahmad; Daei, Leyla

doi:10.22034/thdad.2021.499880.1483

A Comparative Study of the Nature and Effects of Relative Causes of Elimination or Obstruction of Criminal Liability in Iranian and Egyptian Law

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ahmad Mortazi ¹

Leyla Daei ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Faculty of Theology and Humanities, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

² Graduate of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

10.22034/thdad.2021.499880.1483

Abstract

Mental and internal states that, despite the occurrence of a crime, lead to the removal of criminal responsibility from the perpetrator and prevent his punishment, are called reasons for the removal of criminal responsibility, which are both complete and relative. In Egyptian criminal law, the above reasons are referred to as obstacles to criminal responsibility and the means of eliminating the eagle. The relative causes of the removal of criminal responsibility means the placement of a person under certain circumstances and circumstances in which only in that case, due to the decline of the will, criminal responsibility is eliminated. To know. The meaning of good faith is to commit a criminal act with honorable social, human and moral motives. Drowsiness and anesthesia, involuntary drunkenness and urgency are among the relative causes.

Keywords

Obstacles to responsibility

overcoming causes

relative causes

mistakes

drunkenness