نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Background and objective: The main basis for differentiating the responding system in the crimes of children is to pay attention to the pattern of welfare. This model tries to improve the behavioral and personality status of delinquent children and teenagers with a finalist perspective. One of the dimensions of commitment to the welfare model is paying attention to the policy of individualization of sentences. The backbone of individualization sentences of On the other hand, de-authenticization of non-clinical variables such as severity, type and nature of the crime and attention to clinical and extra-legal variables such as emphasis on the personality file are other dimensions of attention to individualization.
Research method: This research, using a survey method, aims to evaluate the acceptance of individualization dimensions in judicial procedure. The statistical community has 293 verdicts of final conviction of branches of the criminal courts of East Azarbaijan province in the period of 2019-1400. The data were analyzed in two parts, descriptive and inferential, using spss 24 software, and the Pearson chi-square correlation test was used to measure the significance of the relationship.
Research findings: The findings indicate non-adherence to the maximum approach to alternative answers to imprisonment and acceptance of the minimum tolerance approach in the target community. Also, according to the chi-square value obtained and the significance level of the test, which is less than (0.05), there is a significant correlation between the variables of intensity, type and nature of the crime and the type of judicial response, and these variables have an effect on the type of response.
Conclusion :Deauthentication of the non-clinical variables of severity,etermining the punishment based on the clinical situation through the generalization of exclusionary responses and avoiding the focalization approach as the dominant criterion of punishment guarantees the right to individualize will be.
کلیدواژهها English
Sources
Persian
- Pourmohiabadi et al., (2017), the dominance of incarcerationism and the dream of de-incarceration in Iran's criminal policy, Criminal Law Review, 9th year, 1st issue, 33-59.
- Roshan, Mohammad, Hosseini, Ansieh, (2014) The role of the family in responding to delinquent children with an emphasis on 2012, Family Research, Year 11, Number 44, 471-490.
- Sabzeh-Ali, Razieh and others (2017), the works of the personality case in Iran's criminal law, judicial legal magazine, 82nd year, number 114, 67-93.
Shamlou, Baqer, (2012) Criminal justice and children, second edition, Tehran: Jangel.
Shams Natri, Mohammad Ebrahim, Riahi, Javad (2013), "Evaluation of social punishments contained in the Islamic Penalty Bill in the light of the replacement model", Islamic Law, ninth year, number 33, 216-191.
- Eshairi, Taha and Rostami, Milad, (2013) Sociological study of factors affecting drivers' tendency to violate traffic laws, Rahor, No. 11, 75-71.
- Gholami, Hossein, (2012), patterns or types of criminal justice for children, criminal law doctrines, 10th year, 6th issue, 106-89.
Gholami, Hossein, Khaksari, Daoud (2018), factors affecting the issuance of alternative prison sentences, Criminal Law Research, 7th year, number 26, 9-40.
- Farajiha, Mohammad, Moghdisi, Mohammad Baqer, (2013), the approach of criminal populism to the criminal justice of juveniles and youths, Criminal Law Doctrines, No. 14, 27-3.
- Firouzjaian, Ali-Asghar, Tavakoli, Javad (2015), sociological analysis of law-abiding driving with an emphasis on social control theory (case study: urban youth), strategic studies of security and social order, fifth year No. 13, 25-40.
- Ghorbani, Pegah, (2013) Personality file in the proceedings of delinquent children and juveniles, first edition, Tehran: Jungle Publishing.
- Kermani Nazerzadeh, Farnaz and Emami, Zeinab (2013), examining the procedure and attitude of judges of children's courts in Tehran to alternatives to imprisonment, Judicial Legal Perspectives, No. 65, 156-180.
- Garland, David, (2013), Adaptive Responses of Penal Modernism", a collection of essays in honor of Dr. Mohammad Ashuri, translated by Mohammad Farjiha, fifth edition, Tehran: Samt.
Mozami, Shahla, (2014), special proceedings for children and teenagers, Tehran: Dadgstar, first edition.
Mansourabadi, Abbas and colleagues (2016), patterns of judicial decision-making in America and Iran, Criminal Law Research, fifth year, number 18, 143-164.
- Mahdavipour, Azam and colleagues (2017), "Reviewing alternatives to Batakieh Prison, Prisoner's Detention Center", Criminal Law Research, 6th year, No. 23, 317-281.
- Nadi-Babaei, Hemat-Allah and others, (2019) Pattern of responding to crimes of children and adolescents in Iran's judicial system, Judicial Legal Journal, year 84, number 111, 173-191.
Najafi Abrandabadi, Ali Hossein, (1387) Criminology Lectures, Doctoral Course in Criminal Law and Criminology, Tarbiat Modares University.
-Niyazpour, Amir Hassan, (2014) Legalization of criminological findings in the first book of the Islamic Penal Code 2013, Legal Research, No. 72, 259-233.
- Watani, Amir and others, (2018) Pathology of the realization of correctional and therapeutic goals of criminals through the personality file in the process of criminal proceedings, Medical Law, No. 50, 175-178.
- Winterdyke, Jan. E. (2017) The Criminal Justice System of Children and Adolescents in the International Arena, translated by Hanieh Hejbralsadati, Encyclopaedia of Criminal Justice of Children and Adolescents, edited by Tehmourt Bashirieh, first edition, Tehran: Naghah Maaser.
- Yousefi, Hassan, Jovan Jafari Bejnarodi, Abdul Reza (1400), the philosophy of intimidation in the experimental critique: evaluating the deterrence of imprisonment and fines in the city of Mashhad, judicial legal perspectives, 26th year, number 93, 45-21.
.Latin
- Cavandino, M. & J. Dignan, (2006) Penal Systems, a Comparative Approach, Sage Publications, London.
-Connor, John et al, (2019) Reflections on the justice and welfare debate for children in the Irish criminal justice system, Irish Judicial Studies Journal, vol 3.
-Dunkel, F, (2014) Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe-Reform developments between Justice, welfare and 'new punitiveness', Criminological studies.1 (1):31-76.
- Farrell, H. (2018), Rehabilitation in Washington's Juvenile Justice System: How Longer Sentences may be Well-Intentioned yet Ineffective. Washington State Legislative Internship Program University of Washington, Seattle.
- Mears, D. P.; Cochran, J.C.; Stults, B. J.; Greenman, S. J.; Bhati, A. S. and Greenwald, M. A. (2014), "The "true" juvenile offender: Age effects and juvenile court sanctioning", Criminology, 52(2), pp: 169-194.
- Robbennolt, Robert J. MacCoun, and John M. Darley, "Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging," in Klein and Mitchell, The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making, 27-38.
-Smith, Roger, Gray, Patricia, (2019), The changing shape of youth justice: Models of practice, Criminology & Criminal Justice, Vol. 19(5) 554–571.
- Ward, Tony & Maruna, Shadd, (2007) Rehabilitation, beyond the risk paradigm, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York.
