منابع فارسی
باقری، نفیسه. (1402). مطلوب عدالتترمیمی در رویارویی با بزهدیدگی جنسی کودکان و نوجوانان با تأکید بر سیاست جنایی مشارکتی، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه علوم تحقیقات تهران.
توجهی، عبدالعلی (1391). اندیشه حمایت از بزهدیدگان و جایگاه آن در گستره جهانی و سیاست جنایی تقنینی ایران، مندرج در علوم جنایی (مجموعه مقالات در تجلیل از دکتر محمد آشوری)، تهران: سمت، چاپ پنجم.
جمشیدی، علیرضا.(1395). سیاست جنایی مشارکتی. تهران: انتشارات میزان، چاپ اول.
حاجی خسروی، فرزانه (1394). جایگاه عدالتترمیمی در قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری مصوب 1392، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران.
حسینی, سید محمد؛ ابراهیمی, محمداحسان. (1398). سیاست جنایی قضایی در خصوص مال مسروق. مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی, 49(1), 65-86. doi: 10.22059/jqclcs.2019.73347
رایجیان اصلی، مهرداد. (1390). بزهدیدهشناسی حمایتی، تهران: انتشارات دادگستر، چاپ دوم.
رحمانی، محمد(1394). مبانی سیاست جنایی تراز جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تهران: مجمع عامی و فرهنگی مجد، چاپ اول.
زینالی, امیرحمزه. (1393). سازوکارهای حقوق کیفری ایران در زمینۀ اعمال حق دادخواهی کودکان بزهدیده (حق بر شکایت کودک). پژوهشهای حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی, 2(3), 29-52. قابل بازیابی از: https://jclc.sdil.ac.ir/article_42591.html
عابد گنجی، مهدیه (1390). بررسی بزهدیدگی جنسی کودکان توسط افراد پدوفیل )کودک دوست( و راههای جلوگیری از حدوث اختلالات رفتاری و بِزهکاری کودکان در آینده، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامیواحد تهران مرکز.
فصیح رامندی، منصوره (1397). خشونت جنسی نسبت به کودک به مثابه نقض حقوق بشر. مجله علمی پژوهشی حقوق پزشکی. ۱۲ (۴۶) صص.۲۰۷-۲۳۴. قابل بازیابی از: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-904-fa.html
قنبرنیا، مهری. (1389). بررسی سیاست جنایی نظام کیفری تقنینی ایران در حمایت از اطفال بزهدیده با محوریت کودک آزاری والدین با نگاهی به حقوق انگلستان، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
کرامتی معز، هادی. (1399). بزه دیده شناسی کودکان در شبکه های مجازی.تهران: نشر دادگستر، چاپ اول.
لانرژ، کریستین. (1374).درآمدی به سیاست جنایی، ترجمه علی حسین نجفی ابرند آبادی، تهران: نشر یلدا.
مقتدائی، آرزو. (1395). پیشگیری از بزهدیدگی جنسی کودکان، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
میرمجیدی, سپیده. (1400). ویژگیهای الگوی مطلوب برنامههای عدالت ترمیمی در پروندههای خشونت جنسی؛ با نگاهی به گفتمان قضایی ایران. مجله حقوقی دادگستری، 85 (114)و 433-463. . doi: 10.22106/jlj.2021.137409.3709
نجفی ابرند آبادی، علی حسین (1370). تقریرات درس تاریخ تحولات کیفری(سیاست جنایی)، تهیه و تنظیم: ناصر قاسمیدوره کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
نجفی ابرندآبادی، علی حسین، (1396). سیاست جنایی دایره المعارف علوم جنایی اقتصادی، به کوشش: امیرحسن نیازپور، تهران، نشر میزان.
مهمدی گلشن؛ «نقش سازمان های مردم نهاد در دادرسی کیفری»، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی، دانشگاه کاشان، 1392.
هدایت, هدیه و هدایت، همدم (۱۳۹۷). «جایگاه دادسرا و وظایف خاص دادستان در حمایت از کودکان بزهدیده و در معرض خطربا توجه به قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری 1392»، اولین همایش ملی جهانی سازی حقوق کودکان و نوجوانان از دیدگاه حقوقی و روانشناسی، موسسه آموزش عالی حکیم نظامیقوچان، شماره1. بازیابی از طریق:
https://civilica.com/doc/771094
منابع انگلیسی
Angel, C. M. (2005). University of Pennsylvania); see also Jeff Latimer et al., The effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta. Crime Victims Meet Their Offenders: Testing the Impact of Restorative Justice Conferences on Victim’s Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms, 85.
Assembly, U. N. (2005a). Report of the Independent Expert for the United Nations Study on Violence Against Children. 26.
Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in Decision-Making in Out-of-Home Care in Australia: What do Young People Say?33 CHILD. & YOUTH SERVICES REV.
Bloomsbury collections - restorative justice and criminal justice - competing or reconcilable paradigms? (n.d.). Bloomsburycollections.com. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/restorative-justice-and-criminal-justice-competing-or-reconcilable-paradigms/ch12-restorative-justice-in-canada-from-sentencing-circles-to-sentencing-principles
Bolitho, J., & Freeman, K. (2016). The use and effectiveness of restorative justice in criminal justice systems following Child Sexual Abuse or comparable harms. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2877603
Braithwaite, J., & Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: restorative justice and civil society. In H. Strang & &. J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 1–13). Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, John. (2002). Setting standards for restorative justice. 42 BRIT. J. CRIMINOLOGY, 563, 569–570.
Burton, M., Evans, R., & Sanders, A. (2007). Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.1
Child Victims. (n.d.). Oup.com. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/child-victims-9780198257004?cc=us&lang=en&
Circle sentencing: Part of the restorative justice continuum. (2014). In Restorative Justice for Juveniles : Conferencing, Mediation and Circles. Hart Publishing.
Clair Garbett, “And Focused Upon Victims’ Needs”: Towards an Assessment of the Victim-Oriented Principles of Restorative Justice Practices. (1993). In Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony. Guilford Publications.
Cossar, J. (2014). You’ve Got to Trust Her and She’s Got to Trust You’: Children’s Views on Participation in the Child Protection System. CHILD. & FAM. SOC. WORK, 103.
Crawford, A., & Burden, T. (2005). Integrating victims in restorative youth justice. Policy Press.
Crow & Peter, G., & Marsh, F. (1998). Lisa Merkel-Holguin, Sharing Power with the People: Family Group Conferencing as a Democratic Experiment. 31 J. SOC. & SOC. WELFARE, 155.
Duckworth, C. (2013). Intergenerational Justice. In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 1484–1492). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
E/2002/INF/2/add.2 Economic and Social Council. (2002). Www.un.org. https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2002/07/E2002INF2Add2.pdf
Family Group Conferences (FGCs): An FGC is a process led by family members to plan and make decisions for a child who is at risk. Children/young people and vulnerable adults are normally involved in their own FGC, although often with support from an advocate. It is a voluntary process and families cannot be forced to have an FGC. (n.d.). In Family Group Conferences (FGCs) | Your Family Matters.
Finkelhor, D. (2014). Childhood victimization: Violence, crime, and abuse in the lives of young people (Reprint edition). Oxford University Press.
Furman & Duane, W. (1985). Children’s Perceptions of the Personal Relationships in Their Social Networks, 21 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOL.
Gal, T. (2014). Crime victimization and child well-being. In Handbook of Child Well-Being (pp. 2617–2652). Springer Netherlands.
Gal, T. (2021). Setting standards for child‐inclusive restorative justice. Family Court Review, 59(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12546
Gal, T., & Eds, &. B. F. D. (Eds.). (2015). Id. at 59; Eran Uziely, Pupils` Participation in Placement Committees in Israel Implementing the Principle of Child Participation.
Ganna, G. (2015). Children’s and Young People’s Participation Within Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: A State-of-the-Art Review. 20 CHILD & FAM. SOC. WORK, 129.
Hh Peter Rook, Q. C. (n.d.). pdf (justice.org.uk). JUSTICE report on Prosecuting Sexual Offences | ICCA.
Hicks, A. J., & Lawrence, J. A. (1993). Children’s criteria for procedural justice: Developing a Young People’s Procedural Justice Scale. Social Justice Research, 6(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048475
Inclusion and Participation in Special Education Processes in Ontario, Canada. (2015a). In Download: Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect |The National Academies Press (pp. 37–58). Oxford University Press.
Inclusion and Participation in Special Education Processes in Ontario, Canada. (2015b). In International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation (pp. 37–58). Oxford University Press.
Koss, M. P. (2013). The RESTORE Program of Restorative Justice for Sex Crimes: Vision, Process, and Outcomes, 29 J. J. INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.
Larsen, J. J. (2014). Restorative Justice in the Australian Criminal Justice System, 127 RES. 127 RES. & PUB. POL’Y, 6.
Lawrence, J. A. (2003). Safeguarding Fairness for Children in Interactions with Adults in Authority: Computer- Based Investigations of the Judgments of Secondary School Students. Criminology Research Council.
Lev-Wiesel, R., & First, M. (2018). Willingness to disclose child maltreatment: CSA vs other forms of child abuse in relation to gender. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.010
Mark, S., & Umbreit ; John, S. (1989). Crime Victims Seeking Fairness, Not Revenge: Toward Restorative Justice, in 53 FED. PROB, 52, 52–57.
Mark, S., & Umbreit, R. (2006). Arab Offenders Meet Jewish Victim: Restorative Family Dialogue in Israel. Q, 24.
Mortimer &, J. T., & Call, K. T. (2001). Joan Pennell, Family Group Conferencing in Child Welfare: Responsive and Regulatory Interfaces. ADOLESCENCE: A STUDY OF ADJUSTMENT IN CONTEXT.
Oranga tamariki act 1989 no 24 (as at 01 September 2022), public act contents – New Zealand legislation. (2022, September 16). New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0024/latest/DLM147088.html
Pali, B., & Randazzo, S. (2018). Practical Guide: Implementing Restorative Justice with Child Victims. In Practical Guide: Implementing Restorative Justice with Child Victims (pp. 1–120).
Panel on Research on Child Abuse and Neglect, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, & National Academy of Sciences. (1993). Understanding child abuse and neglect. National Academies Press.
Paré, M. (2015). Inclusion and participation in special education processes in Ontario, Canada. In International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation (pp. 37–58). Oxford University Press.
Pavelka, S. (2016). finding that most US states have incorporated restorative justice legislation that include general provisions and intent, practices, funding, and evaluation). Restorative Justice in the States: An Analysis of Statutory Legislation and Policy, 13.
Pennell, J. (2004). Family Group Conferencing in Child Welfare: Responsive and Regulatory Interfaces, 31 J. J. SOC. & SOC. WELFARE, 117.
Project dove. (n.d.). Projectdoveor.org. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://projectdoveor.org/
Redirect notice. (n.d.). Google.com. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAQQw7AJahcKEwjA55Wmju37AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=
Resistance and Adaptation to Criminal Identity: Using Secondary Analysis to Evaluate Classic Studies of Crime and Deviance. (n.d.). Sociology-the Journal of The British Sociological.
Resistance and Adaptation to Criminal Identity: Using Secondary Analysis to Evaluate Classic Studies of Crime and Deviance. Sociology-the Journal of The British Sociological Association.Fielding_2008_Resistance_and_adaptation_to_criminal_identity-with-cover-page-v2. (n.d.).
Restorative justice in Canada: From sentencing circles to sentencing principles. (2014). In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice : Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Hart Publishing.
Robinson, L. (2022). Youth justice services: Good practice guide. Why-me.org. https://why-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Youth-Justice-Good-Practice-Guide-4.pdf
See Also, L., & Stutzman Amstutz, T. (2009). While others in the field use terminology such as “victim-offender conferencing” or dialogue, the authors have chosen to use “one-one-one conferencing” or dialogue. When referencing the work of others, the authors use language consistent with their work. When the authors discuss their work. In E. Zinsstag & &. Marie (Eds.), SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: LEGAL, SOCIAL AND THERAPEUTIC DIMENSIONS.
Shachaf-Friedman & Uri, E. (2008). Family-Group Conferencing in Israel: The Voices of Victims Following Restorative Justice Proceedings. TRENDS AND ISSUES IN VICTIMOLOGY, 57.
Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068876
Sherman, L. W. (2015). Twelve Experiments in Restorative Justice: The Jerry Lee Program of Randomized Trials of Restorative Justice Conferences, 11(4). J. EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 11.
Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Inkpen, N., Newbury-Birch, D., Rossner, M., Angel, C., Mearns, M., & Slothower, M. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: the Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 501–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9247-6
Strang, Heather. (2004). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford University Press.
Strang, Heather, Sherman, L. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) using face‐to‐face meetings of offenders and victims: Effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.12
Stutzman Amstutz, L., & Book, T. (2009). While others in the field use terminology such as “victim-offender conferencing” or dialogue, the authors have chosen to use “one-one-one conferencing” or dialogue. When referencing the work of others, the authors use language consistent with their work. When the authors discuss their work. In E. Zinsstag & &. Marie (Eds.), SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: LEGAL, SOCIAL AND THERAPEUTIC DIMENSIONS.
Summary for enhancing domestic violence protections for LGBT people in the Philippines and Sri Lanka. (2022).
Tali Gal & Shomron Moyal, Juvenile Victims in Restorative Justice: Findings from the Reintegrative Shaming Experiments. (2011). J. OF CRIMINOLOGY, 1014.
Tripathy, J. P. (2013). Secondary data analysis: Ethical issues and challenges. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(12), 1478–1479.
Tucker, C. J. (2001). Conditions of Sibling Support in Adolescence, 15 J. J. FAM. PSYCHOL, 254.
Vanfraechem, I. (2015a). Victims and Restorative Justice (I. Aertsen, I. Vanfraechem, & D. Bolivar Fernandez, Eds.; 1st Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070826
Wong, J. S. (2016). Can at-risk Youth be Diverted from Crime? A Meta-analysis of Restorative Diversion Programs, 43(10) CRIM. CRIM. JUST. & BEHAV, 43(10).
(N.d.-a). Org.uk. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Evaluation%20of%20the%20Northern%20Ireland%20Youth%20Conference%20Service.pdf
(N.d.-b). Euforumrj.org. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.euforumrj.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/report_victimsandrj-2.pdf
(N.d.-c). Govt.Nz. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0024/latest/DLM147088.
(N.d.-d). Sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2599Promoting_restorative_justice.pdf
(N.d.-e). Ssrn.com. Retrieved December 28, 2022, from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2877603.
The need-rights model in dealing with sexual abuse of children and adolescents with the criminal-participatory policy approach
Nafiseh Bagheri
1, Shadi Azimzadeh
2[1], Nasrin Mahra
3, Mohammadali Mahdavi Sabet
4
1- PhD Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:
Children's rights have become increasingly significant in recent years, to the point where doing so is necessary to promote both their intellectual growth and emotional health. The most vulnerable members of society are always the young, and protecting their rights, interests, and dignity from public anger surely requires additional support from parents and institutions in charge of developing regulations. New anomalies have also emerged as social interactions have changed, and both their occurrence and importance have changed. Features for the implementation of restorative justice programs in cases of sexual violence in Iran's judicial discourse are evaluated on the basis of the research's empirical findings. The reaction to sexual crimes has changed in line with the components of criminal-participatory policy in most legal systems, which is given the criminal justice system's limited ability to satisfy the demands of these victims. Empirical research show that the official judicial systems' legislative rhetoric is insufficient to effectively safeguard children who have been sexually abused. The creation and distribution of 100 questionnaires to social workers, families with minor children, and people under 18 revealed that restorative justice's requirements are met by a victim-centered approach to the needs and interests of victims of sexual assault. This study's findings are descriptive-analytical in terms of its kind, level of excellence, and methodology. They concurred in certain situations (lack of active force in this field, absence of formation of specific institutions needed by law), which resulted in the non-implementation of restorative justice, although having differing viewpoints on the consequences.
Keyword:
Sexual victimization, restorative justice, children and teenagers, criminal-participatory policy, desirable model.
